LAV- 25 suggestion...and other things

[AAMC4]

Have you ever thought give LAV-25 the bradley abilities\fire_tow_bradley_ability.lua ??

you know to delete the bradley from the Marines faction...or maybe if you delete the bradley this option could cause unbalance?

Can you tell me something about the working you are making for the next patch?

I suggested long time ago add the new pictures of new coming changes in the DB forum to elevete the interest and the popularity in this Mod... is better if you can do it before to make the release becasue if you make it at the same time the people does not want talk about the new thing added because they prefer play the game than comment (fever play)

make this can help you to return on the first place on the table...I would like to see this mod in the first place again...(you deserve it)

I hope you can make true this petition... thank you so much...

[South]

Have you ever thought give LAV-25 the bradley abilities\fire_tow_bradley_ability.lua ??

you know to delete the bradley from the Marines faction...or maybe if you delete the bradley this option could cause unbalance?

Can you tell me something about the working you are making for the next patch?

I suggested long time ago add the new pictures of new coming changes in the DB forum to elevete the interest and the popularity in this Mod... is better if you can do it before to make the release becasue if you make it at the same time the people does not want talk about the new thing added because they prefer play the game than comment (fever play)

make this can help you to return on the first place on the table...I would like to see this mod in the first place again...(you deserve it)

I hope you can make true this petition... thank you so much...

Does real LAV25 have both 25mm chaingun and TOW launcher?

[AAMC4]

The LAV-25 was designed to replace the Bradley on marines...

the bradley was really criticized because he has tow missile launcher, why ? well ... it supposed any medium armored vehicle can not engage in combat against heavy armored (tank) because his medium armor is really easy to penetrate by any tank in the world... the priority is give support for M1A2 and infantry (IFV infantry fight vehicle)

these vehicles LAV and Bradley with their automatic cannon M242 Bushmaster can penetrate and destroy any Medium armored vehicle that means it is not neccessary the missile launcher...

that is why the LAV does not need missile launcher.... these vehicle were not designed to confron heavy armored vehicles...but if you want, you can put a missile launcher to transform this vehicle on support for the M1A2....

[South]

The LAV-25 was designed to replace the Bradley on marines...

the bradley was really criticized because he has tow missile launcher, why ? well ... it supposed any medium armored vehicle can not engage in combat against heavy armored (tank) because his medium armor is really easy to penetrate by any tank in the world... the priority is give support for M1A2 and infantry (IFV infantry fight vehicle)

these vehicles LAV and Bradley with their automatic cannon M242 Bushmaster can penetrate and destroy any Medium armored vehicle that means it is not neccessary the missile launcher...

that is why the LAV does not need missile launcher.... these vehicle were not designed to confron heavy armored vehicles...but if you want, you can put a missile launcher to transform this vehicle on support for the M1A2....

So you means AAVP7 for T2 and LAV25 for T3?

[I_am_a_Spoon]

Something similar was already suggested internally, but it wasn't very popular. Time will tell I guess.

[AAMC4]

Something similar was already suggested internally, but it wasn't very popular. Time will tell I guess.

it was not popular because is ridiculous use the LAV to confront a Type 59 D...

Like I say before, the LAV does not need the missile launcher... this is not his main funtion... that is why you have the LAV ATGM but I think if you decide delete the Bradley from Marines you need put something that take his function...

the LAV it was not dificult to modify, you already have the bradley missile launcher that can be adapted on the LAV,
about the balance: does not change the balance game if you change one unit for other...

if you are thinking the LAV is too weak, you need consider the Marines faction has smoke cloud ability for vehicles...that is really good to avoid be hit and give the chance to scape

[AAMC4]

well in particular exist one problem....

in US and USMC faction you do not have heavy armored vehicles... only the M1A1 and M1A2 are heavy armored vehicles....but they come from outside the battlefield

what I suggested before:

well... Give the option to build the Tank in their main factories (T3)..

For Regular game where you can build a single Abrams you can chose between A "cheaper" abrams without veterancy maybe (900 or 1000 manpower cost) or call outside the battlefield an ACE abrams with 3tr level veterancy ( 1300 or 1400 manpower cost)...

On this way you have 2 vehicles in (T3) abrams tank models (M1A2 or M1A1) and Bradley or Lav-25 with Tow missile depending on faction.....

The USMC does not have Stryker MGS, M1A2, M1A2 tusk....

http://mmzone.co.kr/media/files/9974/mm ... 782690.jpg

(T1)

Infantry
MG team
AT team
Sniper
Mortar
Special forces (MARSOC or RANGERS)

(T2)

The LAV-C2 Stryker with M240
The Striker 50 cal the AAVP
Stryker mortar M113 mortar carrier
HMMWV HMMWV
Striker ATGM LAV ATGM

(T3)

The bradley LAV-25
M1A2 (TUSK) M1A1