Page 1 of 1
Suggestions: about Bradley
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:35 am
by South
Just something I just think about:
1. Increase the firing rate of Bushmaster cannon of Bradley and LAV-25(and remake the recoil animation), this would make them more fit the role of "T3 heavy armor".
2. give a alternative upgrade "M6 linebacker" for M2 Bradley, to make it more effective against aircraft.
Re: Suggestions: about Bradley
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 12:42 pm
by AAMC4
South wrote:Just something I just think about:
1. Increase the firing rate of Bushmaster cannon of Bradley and LAV-25(and remake the recoil animation), this would make them more fit the role of "T3 heavy armor".
2. give a alternative upgrade "M6 linebacker" for M2 Bradley, to make it more effective against aircraft.
the Bradley has the TOW missile launcher...anyway the Bradley and LAV-25 are not design to confront any heavy armored vehicle, they are IFV (infantry support vehicles)
their cannons are really good against PLA "IPC and IFV" vehicles but the LAV-25 armor is too thin to confront : pgz95 spaaa, zbd AFV ....
For confront armored vehicles I preffer use the Stryker ATGM or LAV ATGM.... are better...
about the M6 linebacker, I suggested this before but the developers team does not have time to make other Bradley model for a specific funtion because the PLA only have a single doctrine with a single airstrike...
that is why they added in the bradley the ability to shot down airplanes that he had not previously....
Re: Suggestions: about Bradley
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 1:42 pm
by South
AAMC4 wrote:South wrote:Just something I just think about:
1. Increase the firing rate of Bushmaster cannon of Bradley and LAV-25(and remake the recoil animation), this would make them more fit the role of "T3 heavy armor".
2. give a alternative upgrade "M6 linebacker" for M2 Bradley, to make it more effective against aircraft.
the Bradley has the TOW missile launcher...anyway the Bradley and LAV-25 are not design to confront any heavy armored vehicle, they are IFV (infantry support vehicles)
their cannons are really good against PLA "IPC and IFV" vehicles but the LAV-25 armor is too thin to confront : pgz95 spaaa, zbd AFV ....
For confront armored vehicles I preffer use the Stryker ATGM or LAV ATGM.... are better...
about the M6 linebacker, I suggested this before but the developers team does not have time to make other Bradley model for a specific funtion because the PLA only have a single doctrine with a single airstrike...
that is why they added in the bradley the ability to shot down airplanes that he had not previously....
There's reason why NATO countries uses chaingun instead of low pressure gun, it's that chaingun has a 200rpm fire rate and an equal (or superior) firepower than low pressure gun(like the gun of BMP1 and FV101).
And, there's no need to make a completely new model for Bradley, only Stinger launcher is enough. After all, real Linebackers are modified from M2A2s.
Re: Suggestions: about Bradley
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:19 pm
by AAMC4
South wrote:AAMC4 wrote:South wrote:Just something I just think about:
1. Increase the firing rate of Bushmaster cannon of Bradley and LAV-25(and remake the recoil animation), this would make them more fit the role of "T3 heavy armor".
2. give a alternative upgrade "M6 linebacker" for M2 Bradley, to make it more effective against aircraft.
the Bradley has the TOW missile launcher...anyway the Bradley and LAV-25 are not design to confront any heavy armored vehicle, they are IFV (infantry support vehicles)
their cannons are really good against PLA "IPC and IFV" vehicles but the LAV-25 armor is too thin to confront : pgz95 spaaa, zbd AFV ....
For confront armored vehicles I preffer use the Stryker ATGM or LAV ATGM.... are better...
about the M6 linebacker, I suggested this before but the developers team does not have time to make other Bradley model for a specific funtion because the PLA only have a single doctrine with a single airstrike...
that is why they added in the bradley the ability to shot down airplanes that he had not previously....
There's reason why NATO countries uses chaingun instead of low pressure gun, it's that chaingun has a 200rpm fire rate and an equal (or superior) firepower than low pressure gun(like the gun of BMP1 and FV101).
And, there's no need to make a completely new model for Bradley, only Stinger launcher is enough. After all, real Linebackers are modified from M2A2s.
that was exactly what I said....not change the model, only change the missile capacity to (AA) ... but the real linebacker can rotate the missile launcher vertically that is the problem...
I love the idea to make specialized vehicles... i am with you with the linebacker idea but they only will make this unit if they decide add new airstrikes for PLA faction...
about the chaingun Vs bushmaster....I have nothing to say... maybe the chaingun can shoot more round per minut than the bushmaster but if you use this cannon in a real battle maybe you will spend your munition too faster or maybe cause a overheating barrel...that can cause a barrel explotion...
until the moment I do not know how many rounds the bradley can shoot before to reload...
Re: Suggestions: about Bradley
Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 3:33 am
by South
AAMC4 wrote:that was exactly what I said....not change the model, only change the missile capacity to (AA) ... but the real linebacker can rotate the missile launcher vertically that is the problem...
I love the idea to make specialized vehicles... i am with you with the linebacker idea but they only will make this unit if they decide add new airstrikes for PLA faction...
about the chaingun Vs bushmaster....I have nothing to say... maybe the chaingun can shoot more round per minut than the bushmaster but if you use this cannon in a real battle maybe you will spend your munition too faster or maybe cause a overheating barrel...that can cause a barrel explotion...
until the moment I do not know how many rounds the bradley can shoot before to reload...
Bushmaster is a chaingun...I meant Bushmaster vs low-pressure gun.