Page 3 of 3

Re: Some suggestions about tanks and more

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 12:57 pm
by The Soldier
I do agree that the 120mm Stryker is just stright-up OP right now. :P Can't argue there - way too much damage. The PLA Rocket Launcher is also a bit underpowered right now, I personally think it needs to have a few extra rockets (maybe 2 or 3) and a faster firing rate. And the PLA doesn't have an SPGs because they don't need them - right now, they get the most non-doctrinal artillery.

And the 155mm Artillery Strike and the Paladin are both doctrinal, and are both kind of expensive in terms of Command Points needed. Being doctrinal, they're obviously going to be powerful.

Re: Some suggestions about tanks and more

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:11 pm
by South
The Soldier wrote:I do agree that the 120mm Stryker is just stright-up OP right now. :P Can't argue there - way too much damage. The PLA Rocket Launcher is also a bit underpowered right now, I personally think it needs to have a few extra rockets (maybe 2 or 3) and a faster firing rate. And the PLA doesn't have an SPGs because they don't need them - right now, they get the most non-doctrinal artillery.

And the 155mm Artillery Strike and the Paladin are both doctrinal, and are both kind of expensive in terms of Command Points needed. Being doctrinal, they're obviously going to be powerful.

I think BM21(Type 81) could be doctrinal too(for Asymmetric warfare commander tree, it still have an "empty" position), and restore Type 89 MLRS to what it was like in 1.014. This would handicap "Barrage Bastards" while not cut too much of game experience.

Re: Some suggestions about tanks and more

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:14 pm
by The Soldier
Having two units that perform the same action isn't the best thing for gameplay, I hate to tell you. :P