CoH: Modern Combat

chinatown90 wrote:

South wrote:Yep, I used the name which can be easier unstood by international players.
I think more stuff is always good, if the commander tree have enough space.

Er,I want to say that T85 HMG is too old.PLA has used QJZ-89 12.7mm HMG.
呃，我想说，85式高射机枪已经很旧了，解放军已经用89式12.7毫米重机枪取代了它。

Another thing is that “Dongfeng” is “eastwind”, not “easewind”.
另一件事是“东风”应为“eastwind”，不是“easewind”。

Many PLA new weapon was called “XXX-2000”,such as PGZ-95(PGZ-2000) and ZBD-05(ZBD-2000).But their real name aren't “XXX-2000”.
许多解放军的新式武器都被误称为“2000式某某某”，像是95式自行高炮（2000式自行高炮）和05式两栖步战车（2000式两栖步战车）。但是，他们的真名都不是“2000式某某某”。

And what weapon do the US and PLA Airborne use?M14EBR and QBZ-03?
还有，美国和中国空降部队用什么武器？M14EBR战术步枪和03式突击步枪吗？

Airborne usually uses shortened firearms. Because a longer firearm would usually cause trouble when opening parachute.

Either that, or a weapon that could easily be broken down and put back together. Or not at all - a lot of US paratroopers in WWII dropped down with an M1 Garand - a standard rifle, pretty long if you ask me.

chinatown90 wrote:

South wrote:Yep, I used the name which can be easier unstood by international players.
I think more stuff is always good, if the commander tree have enough space.

Er,I want to say that T85 HMG is too old.PLA has used QJZ-89 12.7mm HMG.
呃，我想说，85式高射机枪已经很旧了，解放军已经用89式12.7毫米重机枪取代了它。

Another thing is that “Dongfeng” is “eastwind”, not “easewind”.
另一件事是“东风”应为“eastwind”，不是“easewind”。

Many PLA new weapon was called “XXX-2000”,such as PGZ-95(PGZ-2000) and ZBD-05(ZBD-2000).But their real name aren't “XXX-2000”.
许多解放军的新式武器都被误称为“2000式某某某”，像是95式自行高炮（2000式自行高炮）和05式两栖步战车（2000式两栖步战车）。但是，他们的真名都不是“2000式某某某”。

And what weapon do the US and PLA Airborne use?M14EBR and QBZ-03?
还有，美国和中国空降部队用什么武器？M14EBR战术步枪和03式突击步枪吗？

PLA Airborne troops also use QBZ-95. For example,
National Day parade show does not mean QBZ-03 is indeed in service.

chainsaw wrote:

chinatown90 wrote:

South wrote:Yep, I used the name which can be easier unstood by international players.
I think more stuff is always good, if the commander tree have enough space.

Er,I want to say that T85 HMG is too old.PLA has used QJZ-89 12.7mm HMG.
呃，我想说，85式高射机枪已经很旧了，解放军已经用89式12.7毫米重机枪取代了它。

Another thing is that “Dongfeng” is “eastwind”, not “easewind”.
另一件事是“东风”应为“eastwind”，不是“easewind”。

Many PLA new weapon was called “XXX-2000”,such as PGZ-95(PGZ-2000) and ZBD-05(ZBD-2000).But their real name aren't “XXX-2000”.
许多解放军的新式武器都被误称为“2000式某某某”，像是95式自行高炮（2000式自行高炮）和05式两栖步战车（2000式两栖步战车）。但是，他们的真名都不是“2000式某某某”。

And what weapon do the US and PLA Airborne use?M14EBR and QBZ-03?
还有，美国和中国空降部队用什么武器？M14EBR战术步枪和03式突击步枪吗？

PLA Airborne troops also use QBZ-95. For example,
National Day parade show does not mean QBZ-03 is indeed in service.

The QBZ-03 is a great weapon,it has folding buttstock.QBZ-03 is used by the 2nd-tier forces and 15th Airborne Crops.Only a little Airborne riflemen use QBZ-95.According to the news,the QBZ-03 is better than QBZ-95.
And I think if PLA use ZSL-92,they will destroy Stryker easily.Because ZSL-92 has a 25mm gun but Stryker only has 7.62 or 12.7mm HMG.The ZSL-92A only has a 12.7mm HMG.Use ZSL-92A is better than ZSL-92.Also,we can use LAV-25 instead of Stryker and use LAV-AG instead of Stryker MGS.
The engineers usually uses SMG.The US engineers can use MP7 and the PLA engineers can use Type 85 SMG.